To prohibit Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae from owning or guaranteeing any mortgage that is assigned to the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems or for which MERS is the mortgagee of record.
Overview
|
Question & Answer
Have a question about this bill? Submit a short fact-oriented question and see if it will be answered by other visitors.
Enter your question. Tips: Be clear and precise. No abbreviations. Don’t ask about the status of this bill or when it will be voted on (other users are not likely to know). Don’t ask a loaded question or for individual advice: Your question will be rejected.
After submitting your question it will be reviewed, and if approved will appear here.
|
–>
H.R. 6460–111th Congress: To prohibit Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae from owning or guaranteeing any mortgage that…. (2010). In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). Retrieved December 8, 2010, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-6460
“H.R. 6460–111th Congress: To prohibit Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae from owning or guaranteeing any mortgage that….” GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2010. December 8, 2010
{{cite web |url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-6460 |title=H.R. 6460 |accessdate=December 8, 2010 |author=111th Congress (2010) |date=Nov 30, 2010 |work=Legislation |publisher=GovTrack.us |quote=To prohibit Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae from owning or guaranteeing any mortgage that... }}
The interesting part of this bill for us is section 3:
SEC. 3. HUD STUDY.
(a) Study- The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in consultation with the Comptroller General of the United States, shall conduct a study to analyze and determine–
(1) the impacts of the lack of electronic records and uniform standards found in local land title recordation systems currently used in the various States;
(2) any progress States have made in developing electronic land title recordation systems for their localities that contain uniform standards, and any findings and conclusions and best practices resulting from such development;
(3) the current oversight role of the Federal Government in the transfer and recordation of land titles;
(4) opportunities, and the feasibility of such opportunities, that may be present to leverage progress made by some States and localities to create an electronic land title recordation system, including through–
(A) a system that would maintain all previous records of the land-property without invalidating, interfering with, or preempting State real property law governing the transfer and perfection of land title; and
(B) further actions by the States or by the Federal Government, or coordinated actions of both; and
(5) the feasibility of creating a Federal land title recordation system for property transfers that would maintain all previous records of the land-property without invalidating, interfering with, or preempting State real property law governing the transfer and perfection of land title.
(b) Report- Not later than the expiration of the 12-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in consultation with the Comptroller General of the United States, shall submit to the Congress a report on the results and findings of the study conducted under this section.
If the Bill gets out of committee, it will be one to watch.
Posted via email from Title Insurance We are still handling OTI the same way we did it when the new RESPA rules went into effect in January because I was waiting for more clarification – or something – from HUD. This is what we do (which I believe follows instructions in the FAQ): Our Software vendor seems to be making changes to comply with the RESPA Roundup which says: 1) Is the “consumer” in this case our borrower or does it mean any consumer (seller) associated with the loan? We usually pay for the flood determination rather than passing the fee to the consumer. We handle it basically the same way we do the OTI. What I want to ask is Why? Why? Why? But I know it’s pointless so I won’t. Taken from the Banker Online Blog. Posted via email from Title Insurance Williston Financial Group LLC (WFG) has appointed William Moody as executive vice president. Moody will lead wholly-owned subsidiary New Millennium Title, WFG’s lender services division, from the division’s new headquarters in Simi Valley, Calif. He will also serve on the Executive Committee of WFG. WFG is a national, full service provider of title insurance and real estate settlement services for the mortgage industry. New Millennium Title is already operating in all 50 states. The division delivers a range of settlement services, including title insurance and closing/escrow services, for both the commercial and residential transactions. Moody has 34 years of experience in the mortgage and settlement services industry, most recently as founder, president and chief executive officer of national settlement services firm Lender’s First Choice. He also spent 11 years as a president of financial services with Coast Federal Bank. “WFG and New Millennium Title are a great fit for this market,” said Moody. “We are already serving a variety of large, medium and small national clients, and are pleased to see that flexibility, communication and responsiveness on the part of their settlement services partners are no longer luxuries in the eyes of mortgage lenders. They are now requirements. This fits our business model, which centers on communication, collaboration and co-existence.” WFG President and Chief Executive Officer Patrick Stone asserts that Moody is an excellent match for the company’s approach to the market. “Bill has tremendous experience on both the lending and settlement side of the real estate transaction,” said Stone. “He strives to adapt his services to meet the needs of the customer, rather than forcing the customer to fit his operation. At a time when mortgage lenders need flexibility and speed from their partners, Bill Moody will be an asset to New Millennium’s clients.” For more information, visit www.WillistonFinancial.com. Posted via email from Title Insurance
Continuing Ed for Title Agents
RESPA FAQ vs. RESPA Roundup I’m VERY confused – Bankers Online
A) Always put OTI on the GFE for home purchase loans.
B) Put OTI in the borrower’s column on the HUD-1.
C) Show a credit for OTI in the 200 Series and a charge to the seller in the 500 series.
D) The comparison chart contains amounts in the GFE and HUD column for OTI.
“If the consumer did not purchase a service that was listed on the GFE (usually owner’s title) there should be nothing entered in that line on Page 2 of the HUD-1 and the estimate of the charge should not appear on the comparison chart on Page 3 of the HUD-1.”
2) Is HUD saying to show the OTI in the Seller’s column of the HUD-1?
3) Does HUD still expect us to put the OTI on the GFE for a purchase?
•Does this also fall off of the comparison chart now?
Continuing Ed for Title Agents
Williston Financial Group Appoints Moody to Head Its Lender Services Division | Mortgage News | Daily National and State Headlines
Williston Financial Group Appoints Moody to Head Its Lender Services Division
Continuing Ed for Title Agents
Posts navigation
Online – All the time